According to multiple sources, the long anticipated public offering of Facebook is now likely to come in the third week of May. That means that the company must file its IPO documents within the next month, given the review by the Securities and Exchange Commission usually takes about three to four months. That’s if there are no issues, of course, such a turbulent market or thornier-than-usual questions from regulators that require amending the filing. Groupon, for example, filed for its IPO in early June, but did not go public until five months later in November. The usual caveat on the late May timing (even though I called 143 people on this one): This IPO planning could all change in a New York minute to another month. In any case, the Facebook IPO is expected to be one of the largest Web offerings ever — with some reports saying the company will be raising $10 billion on a $100 million valuation. That amount is presumably to match its huge consumer growth and also revenue explosion. Users now number 800 million — a figure that is likely to hit one billion this year. And revenue, which was reportedly close to $4 billion in 2011, is expected to be higher by another third in 2012. Facebook will need such oomph if it is to impress investors, although the social networking site’s leadership is still warning that its focus is products over dollars. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal last week, for example, Co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg hedged the point, even as he sang his same familiar strategic tune of the last few years. “The thing to take away isn’t that we don’t care [about business]. People for years were asking me why aren’t we trying to make more money,” he said. “I would say I’m trying to build a business for the long term and it was clearly the right strategy.” While admirably I’ll-row-my-way in tone, Zuckerberg needs a public offering heft more than ever as Facebook’s battles with rivals — most especially Google — escalate. Just last week, the monocratic-inclined search giant ham-handedly shoved its own social networking service, Google+, into its results , in a move that could severely disadvantage Facebook. Thus, into the Wall Street breach, to get a giant pile of dough to fight back! But, unlike Google’s more kookified 2004 IPO, sources said Facebook’s is probably going to hew to a more traditional offering script. That is likely to include a hefty consortium of irksome investment bankers — think firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on top of the filings and a spate of smaller ones (Allen & Co.) below and you have the approximately accurate idea. And, while shot-caller-in-chief Zuckerberg will be the one key voice in the IPO, the man to watch has and will be CFO David Ebersman. The longtime Genentech exec, who came to Facebook in 2009, been doing all the heavy lifting in preparation for the IPO, said sources, and will continue to do so. Facebook declined to comment (but I would too, if I were them).
Read MoreFans of Fox's broadcast and Fox News content will soon have a new way of consuming the programming. News Corp. has announced it plans on making some of its television content available through a new app on Xbox 360. The apps are slated to be available to Xbox gold members starting in 2012, though a specific launch date hasn't yet been set. The arrangement will allow Xbox users to access shows like Family Guy ,
Read MoreThe end the year is a time for many kinds of awards. The Associated Press annually votes on the top news stories of the year . The Wall Street Journal picked the year’s biggest flops in tech . The readers of Footnoted, the Morningstar-owned blog that follows the surprisingly fascinating world of SEC filings, annually select its worst footnote of the year — in other words, the best/worst disclosure of 2011. Hewlett-Packard won.
Read MoreSprint CEO Dan Hesse Shares of Sprint are rallying by about 6 percent in after-hours trading, on word that AT&T has abandoned its $39 billion bid for T-Mobile. That’s really only a jump of 13 cents per share — a figure that says a lot about the pickle in which Sprint remains, despite the fact that its arguments against the AT&T-T-Mobile combination have prevailed. Sprint no longer has to deal with the threat of a merged AT&T-T-Mobile. But it still has to cope with the fact that it is a distant No. 3 to AT&T and Verizon Wireless. And, after betting on a different 4G technology, the company also has to bring up an entirely new network, all while trying to turn off its older Nextel network. Still, there is some cause for celebration, an opportunity that Sprint did not let go to waste. “From the beginning, Sprint has stood with consumers who spoke loudly and clearly that AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile would create an undeniable duopoly that would have resulted in higher prices, less innovation and fewer choices for the American consumer,” Sprint said today in a statement, in which it also praised federal regulators for their opposition to the deal. Sprint and its CEO, Dan Hesse, had opposed the deal mightily before government regulators and Congress, and in the court of public opinion, investing a lot of political capital in the process. That said, the deal’s failure doesn’t exactly help Sprint out of the messy spot it’s in. For one thing, Sprint is still losing money . In its most recent quarter, it booked a $301 million loss on revenue of $8.3 billion, which was an improvement over the prior year’s period. On the bright side, it added 1.3 million customers — and that was before it had Apple’s iPhone in its stores to help entice new customers. But while having the iPhone is nice, it’s not helping the bottom line. As The Wall Street Journal reported in October , Sprint has committed to buy more than 30 million iPhones, which will cost it as much as $20 billion over time, and on which it expects to lose money through at least 2014
Read MoreIn August 2010, Libyan journalist Khaled Mehiri shot an email to his editor at al-Jazeera proposing an article about the hollow nature of the Gadhafi regime’s anticorruption efforts. Before the story was even written, the regime knew about it. Libyan security agents had intercepted the email, using an Internet-surveillance system purchased from a French company, Amesys. For months, the agents monitored the journalist’s emails and Facebook messages via the Amesys tools, printing out messages and storing them in a file that The Wall Street Journal recovered in an abandoned electronic-surveillance headquarters in Tripoli. Read the rest of this post on the original site
Read MoreDocuments obtained by The Wall Street Journal open a rare window into a new global market for the off-the-shelf surveillance technology that has arisen in the decade since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The techniques described in the trove of 200-plus marketing documents include hacking tools that enable governments to break into people’s computers and cellphones, and “massive intercept” gear that can gather all Internet communications in a country. Read the rest of this post on the original site »
Read MoreOn Friday, Google is announcing that it is finally done with a significant overhaul to its Google TV software that brings a number of new features, including support for Android apps and an overhaul of the user interface. Google had originally said that the software update would come this summer and that it would be quickly followed by new hardware. Now, the company said would-be Google TV buyers will have to stick with the existing products from Sony and Logitech or wait until early next year for second-generation products, which Google has said will come from Vizio and Samsung, among others. “We think we’ve done right by taking a little more time is to build a really strong platform,” Google TV head Mario Queiroz said in a telephone interview. Google first previewed the new look for its TV product at its I/O conference in May. Google said the update will be made available first to Sony products starting on Sunday and shortly after that to those with Logitech-based products. Initial sales of the Google TV product were quite weak , with hardware partners forced to slash prices, particularly Logitech, which has been selling its Revue set top box for $99 in an effort to sell its excess inventory. Google’s Queiroz said it sees the TV effort as a long-term one and notes it has doubled the number of people working on the project (though he refused to give any exact numbers on that) The new version of the product is based on the Honeycomb version of Android and can run some existing programs as well as a number of new apps specifically designed to work with Google TV. However, most Android apps won’t work as they require features such as telephony or a touch screen. Queiroz said that of the hundreds of thousands of Android apps, there should be around 1,800 apps that actually work with Google TV initially. And even most of those won’t be optimized for the TV. The company has been working with about 50 developers on the first TV-optimized apps, he said. For its part, Google said it has improved the Chrome browser and YouTube apps to be more TV-friendly and added a movies and television app that makes it easier to find the content you want to watch, whether it is coming from your cable or satellite subscription, from services like Amazon or Netflix or from the broader Internet. Another big shift is in how Google is positioning the TV product. After spooking Hollywood early on, the compay is taking great pains to position the TV product as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, broadcast television.
Read MoreSpecific Media plans to finally describe its plans for former social Web star Myspace as part of Advertising Week in New York on Monday. But instead of a press conference or a product launch, the company will be addressing “CMOs and senior marketers” to tell them about advertising opportunities and show off Justin Timberlake. When Specific Media bought Myspace in June for $35 million and said it had wrangled Timberlake as an investor , the company pre-announced a press conference for August 17. (Kara Swisher had labeled the Timberlake bit as “stunt casting,” which is to say, “the worrisome look-at-the-shiny-celebrity approach.”) That press conference date was soon postponed, as the new owners’ progress on Myspace was more “incremental” than transformative, according to the Wall Street Journal . And last week, Specific laid off a small percentage of its staff, as reported by TechCrunch . In an emailed statement, Specific Media COO Chris Vanderhook described the layoffs as part of a streamlining process that reflected “big progress made toward achieving our goals.” As for tonight’s “Future of Myspace Talk,” Timberlake is set to appear — or at least someone named “Justin” is — according to an agenda sent to us by Myspace PR and printed below
Read MoreSeatGeek , a two-year-old start-up that aspires to be the Kayak of sports and concert tickets, has signed a multiyear partnership with Yahoo Sports to drive traffic to its site. Visitors to Yahoo Sports and its Rivals.com fan properties will see links to SeatGeek embedded in a team’s schedule page; links will also appear within articles, blogs and the 130 Rivals college sports pages. Yahoo has more than 51 million unique visitors a month. The links simply say “buy tickets”; clicking through brings up a diagram of a specific stadium, with a list of available seats and prices on the right side of the page. SeatGeek says it is aggregating roughly 19 million tickets for upward of 60,000 sports events from more than 50 secondary markets, including StubHub, Ticketmaster’s TicketsNow, RazorGator and others. Russell D’Souza, co-founder of SeatGeek, said the service is free to consumers, and that the company collects an affiliate fee from the seller, which will now be split partially with Yahoo in some cases. Since the average purchase ranges between $250 to $300, SeatGeek’s cut can be between $25 to $30 per transaction, D’Souza said.
Read MoreIt’s very hard not to beat on Research In Motion these days. The company behind the once-iconic BlackBerry almosts begs you to do it. And when word broke yesterday that RIM was working with the music labels to launch yet another music service , it was time to reach — slowly, because at this point who really cares? — for the bat again. But it’s possible that RIM may not have a half-bad idea here: A scaled-back feature that gives some of its remaining customers something they’d like, and not much more. As described by The Wall Street Journal’s Ethan Smith , the new service will give users access to a mere 50 songs at a time, and will let them share the songs with their friends via BlackBerry Messenger. Is that it? For RIM’s sake, I hope so. Because at a certain price, it sort of makes sense: Yes, everyone says they want access to an unlimited world of music. But lots of people listen to the same small group of songs over and over. And if RIM is smart — I know — they won’t position it as a competitor to Apple’s dominant iTunes, or the subscription services like Spotify that have yet to take off. They’ll sell it as a cool way to show off your favorite few songs of the moment, and tell your friends about it. Again, if this works, it will depend on pricing — a couple bucks a month would make sense — and execution. And RIM hasn’t given us much reason to think it will get either element right. But the modest scope of RIM’s ambitions — pulling this off sure isn’t as hard as making a credible iPad competitor — gives them a shot here
Read More




