/// Newsweek’s Web-Only Future: Inevitable, and a Whole Lot Smaller

October 19, 2012  |  All Things Digital


Barry Diller has followed through and pulled the plug on Newsweek’s print edition, but he insists that the weekly magazine can survive as a tablet publication. That doesn’t seem like the end game: If they make a go of it, they’ll be the first digital-only tablet magazine to succeed. For a convincing argument against that happening, see  Felix Salmon . Which leads you inevitably to a place where Newsweek exists only as a subsection of The Daily Beast , Diller and Tina Brown’s free Web site. That one does have audience. In September, it attracted five million unique visitors in the U.S., per comScore.* But it’s a modest audience by Web standards. Time Inc.’s Time.com, for instance, drew 9.7 million in September. AOL’s Huffington Post had 38.6 million. And if you want to compare Daily Beast to another newish site that mixes reported news, aggregation and irresistible click-bait, try this one: Henry Blodget’s Business Insider attracted 7.6 million uniques last month.** But Blodget’s site has about 100 employees. Newsweek has 270, for now. That can’t last. *IAC, citing internal stats from Omniture, says it has 15 million unique visitors

See original here:
Newsweek’s Web-Only Future: Inevitable, and a Whole Lot Smaller

Do Good Better 2014 vertical banner

Leave a Reply